Mar 24, · The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, (CAA) was notified on December 12, and came into force from January 10, (Note: Rules are mandatory for the implementation of any new or amended law and normally framed within six months of its enactment.) Background: The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, seeks to amend the Citizenship Act, Douglass born a slave, was the leading African American contributor to the passing of the thirteenth amendment to the [ ] Pages: 6 Words: Topics: Political The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass focuses on the lives of slaves during the 19th century. Big database of free essay examples for students at all levels. All Feb 02, · Ethics Argumentative Essay Topics. Ethics deals with the challenge of making the right decisions from the standpoint of moral values. Oftentimes, it is involved when discussing conflicting subjects – those in which, at first sight, both conflicting positions seem to have valid reasoning and appear to be driven by high moral principles
The Meaning, History, & Purpose of the Second Amendment ~ The Imaginative Conservative
19th amendment essay right to bear arms protects 19th amendment essay other right. Without its preservation, a nation would easily succumb to tyranny. As long as this right is upheld, protected, and exercised lawfully, 19th amendment essay, the torch of liberty may continue to burn. The words that form the Second Amendment were chosen deliberately and purposefully.
The founding fathers drew from Biblical principles, English and American history, and English common law to present an amendment protecting the individual right of Americans to keep and bear arms. At its center lie two core principles upon 19th amendment essay both the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence were founded: the law of self-government and the right of 19th amendment essay. The Second Amendment is an appendage to 19th amendment essay Constitution, which in turn relies on the Declaration of Independence for meaning and purpose.
The Declaration articulates the law of self-government while the Constitution presents the application of self-government in various contexts, which includes the right to bear arms. The responsibility and right of the people to bear arms for self-defense are God-given, natural rights of individuals. The right to self-defense was not man-invented or government-created. This amendment does not give the people their right to bear arms, but protects against the infringement of this right, 19th amendment essay.
The First Amendment protects the rights to freedom of religion, 19th amendment essay, speech, the press, assembly, and petition. The Second Amendment acts as the protector and enforcer of those rights, should they be infringed. Self-governing individuals bear the primary responsibility of defending and protecting themselves.
As we shall see by an examination of the historical background of this amendment, there are strong reasons for why the framers recognized the individual right to possess and carry weapons of war, 19th amendment essay the need for a well-regulated militia, as vital to the creation and preservation of a nation of freedom and liberty. The historical foundations of the 19th amendment essay Amendment go further back in the past than events immediately prior to the drafting of the Bill of Rights.
They are imprinted by the finger of God on the heart of man…. The founding fathers did not use explicit Biblical examples to support their arguments because they considered it more appropriate to use non-sectarian terminology in the legal sphere.
A quick summary of the Scriptural foundations for the right of self-defense is as follows, 19th amendment essay. The lawful boundaries of self-defense are clear from this example; defense against an attack is justifiable, but there is nothing to resist if one is not in danger of harm.
In both Numbers and Nehemiah19th amendment essay, the Israelites were required to bear arms. Conversely, Judges and 1 Samuel records two historical periods during which foreign nations kept the Israelites from bearing arms. The concept of a militia could also be found in Numbers 1 and 2 Chronicles ; the nation of Israel had no standing army, and the defense of the nation rested on able-bodied males.
In the New Testament, Jesus Christ never repealed the duty to bear arms. Instead, He upheld it; in LukeHe commands His disciples to acquire swords even if their cloaks had to be sold to purchase one. While the founding fathers built the Constitution and the American Bill of Rights on the principles found in nature and the Bible, they were also influenced by historical events. The founders had a strong grasp of English common law and of the historical background of the right to possess and use weapons in self-defense.
The Assize of Arms is one of the earliest legal documents protecting and even mandating the ownership of weapons for every English freeman between 15 and 40 years of age. England was under a feudal system of government at the time, and the king depended on a well-armed peasantry to defend the country against invaders.
The Assize of Arms extended the right of ownership of weapons to serfs. The statute of Winchester mandated that the citizenry own and train with weapons. Incitizens 19th amendment essay commanded to spend their leisure time training with bows and arrows and to relinquish the playing of games that would distract them from practice.
Similarly, the archery laws of commanded fathers to teach sons, beginning at the age of seven, to handle longbows. Although the mandating of arms is by no means a just law, these legal documents demonstrate that the idea of placing weapons into the hands of the citizens was an old and time-tested concept.
These rights to arms were threatened and restricted by the Militia Act of and the 19th amendment essay Act of William Blackstone, the great commentator on the laws of England, asserted that such restrictions were but an attempt by the government to prevent the people from any kind of insurrection and resistance, 19th amendment essay. The individual right to own weapons was articulated in the English Bill of Rights of When King George III assumed that the right to self-defense originated in the government, he instituted standing armies without the consent of the people, 19th amendment essay.
This was seen as a tyrannical act that overlooked and overstepped the ultimate authority of 19th amendment essay people to self-defense. As tensions grew between the thirteen American colonies and the British government, British soldiers marched into Lexington and Concord on the night of April 18, to seize the firearms and ammunition of the colonists.
The colonists took decisive action to protect their unalienable rights, resist governmental overreach, and restore law, liberty, and order, 19th amendment essay. Many great and valiant men died for the right to keep and bear arms in the bloody battles fought at Lexington and Concord.
They understood that weapons of war are vital to the preservation of liberty. The Second Amendment was written with the understanding of Biblical principles, 19th amendment essay, English common law, and scenes like those of Lexington and Concord, and with a 19th amendment essay sense of responsibility.
The Preamble to the U. Constitution concisely articulated the 19th amendment essay for the Constitution and, by attribution, for the Second Amendment. It must be understood that the Second Amendment is not a source of the right to self-defense, nor does it merely provide protection for a collective right to keep and bear arms. The nature of this right is limited; one may use arms for righteous purposes, not for wrongful ones, 19th amendment essay.
The war over gun control is ultimately a struggle for power. Should the government have the monopoly of force over the people, or should the people hold that monopoly?
The founding fathers, from the lessons learned from battles fought by men such as Cromwell and Washington, understood that for a country to be free and prosperous, the people must hold the monopoly of force. The monopoly of force must never rest in the hands of a select few. As seen throughout history, the most atrocious crimes against humanity were committed by governments which held the monopoly of force over its insufficiently armed citizenry.
The purpose of the Second 19th amendment essay would be rendered obsolete if the citizens may only own and carry inferior arms compared to those owned by the state. The position of the Second Amendment in relation to the First is also crucial; the Second Amendment protects the First and must be acted upon when the First is infringed upon. History has demonstrated that when a government decides to oppress its people unlawfully, forceful resistance may be the only way for the people to preserve law, 19th amendment essay, liberty, and order in their land.
Citizens cannot and should not rely on the government to protect them from violence. The government cannot keep all its citizens safe. Individuals have the natural right to defend themselves. Guns cannot be uninvented; even if guns were banned, those who wish to have guns and who will disregard the law will have guns, while law-abiding citizens would be prevented from arming themselves against such criminals, 19th amendment essay.
This transfer of the responsibility and right to self-defense from the individual to the government has tragic effects, as seen in the case of Warren v. District of Columbia, D. This is not to point fingers at the police; rather, this example demonstrates the importance of personal self-defense and the danger of relying on others for protection. Even those who do not own and carry guns would benefit from those who do because it is better for criminals to imagine they face an armed citizenry than an unarmed one.
An armed society is a 19th amendment essay society; the lack of arms in the hands of law-abiding citizens makes aggression more likely to occur, whether in the form of violence from terrorists and criminals, or from tyrannical overreaches of a government. The genocides that have taken place in the 20th century demonstrate that a government whose aim is to bring harm and even death to its people first disarms them and renders them unable to resist.
Unarmed people are easier to control, manipulate, and oppress. The founders understood the importance of the right to keep and bear arms as demonstrated by Biblical principles, historical examples, and the English common law. Without the preservation of this right, a nation would easily succumb to tyranny.
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics—we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse?
Please consider donating now. Lefferts and is in the public domain, courtesy of Wikimedia 19th amendment essay. All comments are moderated and must be civil, concise, and constructive to the conversation. Comments that are critical of an essay may be approved, but comments containing ad hominem criticism of the author will not be published. Also, comments containing web links or block quotations are unlikely to be approved.
Keep in mind that essays represent the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Imaginative Conservative or its editor or publisher. In order for the right to bear arms to have any meaning if in fact the main purpose is to defend against a tyrannical government, what we would have to do today is disarm the government. Today, no individual could possibly be expected to have enough arms to fight a tyrannical government, and even a whole lot of well-organized, well-armed militias would be no 19th amendment essay for the United States government.
How many militias could afford their own tanks or aircraft? While we should respect the text as it stands and not allow it to be 19th amendment essay to suit the times until 19th amendment essay is repealed properly by the means provided in the Constitution, one cannot help but wonder if the Second Amendment was crafted in a time that is so far removed from today as to be useless.
The notion that the Second Amendment was intended to address a threat that a national standing army may take up arms against any of the separate states is a relic of the 18tg century. Well, I think it happened in the 19th century once: See, the Civil War or the War Between the States. Military members failing to obey lawful orders issued by their superiors risk serious consequences.
Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice UCMJ outlines the crime of willful disobedience by a military member a superior commissioned officer. Article 91 covers willful disobedience of a superior Noncommissioned 19th amendment essay Warrant Officer. These articles require the obedience of LAWFUL orders. Not only should an unlawful order not be obeyed, obeying such an order can result in criminal prosecution.
Military courts have long held that military members are accountable for their actions even while following orders. and this moves up the chain of command as many officers would refuse to have the men in there charge carryout unlawful orders against US citizens ……. thus negating the advantage in weaponry that the US military has.
On a separate note, how did the US technological advantage in military might fare against the viet cong in Vietnam, or the Russians technological advantage in their war in Afghanistan……. I have often wondered if the founders were influenced by the Highland clearances.
Just over two decades before the War of Independence, the Scottish clans were disarmed by force by the English, and lost their independence and way of life. Also now there is no possibility of the populace to have arms equivalent to those of the US state which is now perceived as a threat to the populace by many.
In some years neither law professors, academic scholars, teachers, students or congressional legislators after much debate have not been able to satisfactorily explain or demonstrate the Framers intended purpose of Second Amendment of the Constitution. I will relate further by demonstration, the intent of the Framers, my understanding using the associated wording to explain.
Was there a reason? It is her refusal to acknowledge, 19th amendment essay, recognize or connect the U.
19th Amendment School House Rock
, time: 3:04DNP: Emerging Areas of Human Health
Mar 24, · The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, (CAA) was notified on December 12, and came into force from January 10, (Note: Rules are mandatory for the implementation of any new or amended law and normally framed within six months of its enactment.) Background: The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, seeks to amend the Citizenship Act, The Poor Law Amendment Act (PLAA) known widely as the New Poor Law, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed by the Whig government of Earl blogger.com completely replaced earlier legislation based on the Poor Law of and attempted to fundamentally change the poverty relief system in England and Wales (similar changes were made to the poor law for Scotland in ) Douglass born a slave, was the leading African American contributor to the passing of the thirteenth amendment to the [ ] Pages: 6 Words: Topics: Political The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass focuses on the lives of slaves during the 19th century. Big database of free essay examples for students at all levels. All
No comments:
Post a Comment